Kurtis Macdonald of Edmonton, AB writes:
Who's more likely go to 16-0, the Indianapolis Colts or the New Orleans Saints? Do you think either of them will go 16-0? Will either of them make it to the Super Bowl, and/or win? What's the meaning of life?
Thanks for the (numerous) questions, Kurtis. Let me answer one question at a time. If I had to bet, I would say New Orleans is more likely to go 16-0. Unlike Indy, they rarely eek out games (last Sunday's Redskins miracle proving to be the exception to the rule), and have had a relatively easy road the rest of the way.
This weekend its @ Atlanta vs. Chris Redman (which more or less ensures victory), vs. Dallas (a tough game, especially considering Dallas may need to win this game), vs. Tampa Bay (win), and @ Carolina, which could pose a threat if the Saints choose to sit a few players, or Carolina pounds the ball like they did in their first matchup in New Orleans.
But even then, the Saints have a team-of-destiny feel.
Indy's road is, debatably, harder. They play Denver at home, go to Jacksonville on a Thursday night (this could be a tough game, as Jacksonville is in a playoff race and Thursday nights do weird things to teams... just ask Pittsburgh), followed by the Jets (who may be in a playoff race of their own), and then they head to Buffalo to end the season.
But the biggest thing working against them Indy is their stated belief that it's best to rest their stars. It's kind of surprising considering the same logic has blown up in their face so many times before, but its what they believe and they've earned the right to do that.
I think New Orleans will end 16-0, and I bet Indy gives away a game along the way (quite possibly in Week 17 vs. Buffalo, when Jim Sorgi goes 9/28 for 124 yards and 2 INTs).
As for the Super Bowl, I like New Orleans to make it (what team has a legitimate shot of actually winning in New Orleans? I say no one), and Indy to fall short. In November, they won games by 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 points - eventually their run of luck (and inate ability to comeback) will end.
And as for the meaning of life... I don't have enough time to explain it now, remind me to answer that question in another blog.
Keith Kroker, of Edmonton, AB writes:
Tell me the Red Wings are going to be okay.
Up until a week ago, I could have done just that. But now...
I think Detroit has hit the point where they've lost too much. Before, they were so good and deep that injures didn't seriously affect them, poor goaltending left them unphased, and they could usually turn it on if they were trailing.
But if you think about it, everything has gone wrong. They've suffered a number of huge injuries (Nik Kronwall, Dan Cleary, Johan Franzen, Valtteri Filppula), Chris Osgood still sucks, their ageless defense has aged (Nicklas Lidstrom and Brian Rafalski) and their additions have been massively disappointing (Todd Bertuzzi) or un-Redwinglike (Brad May, Drew Miller). Their trademark depth has been replaced by a team that has two players with more than 16 points, and one of them, Pavel Datsyuk, is on pace for a paltry 60 points.
To compound things, Detroit has always had the ability to call up players who should be top-six forwards with other NHL teams, but this year hasn't worked out that way. Ville Leino, a pool sleeper for many of us, has five points in 27 games, as does Justin Abdelkader.
It's a strange thing to consider, but the Wings could end up as an eighth seed, and take on the Blackhawks or Sharks in the first round. Wouldn't that be exciting?
Tom Lundeen, of Edmonton, AB writes:
Say something nice about the Oilers. Just once.
Okay.
Quietly, I think Ladislav Smid has become the Oilers most positive story this season. He is a legitimately good defenseman, who may be their most reliable player in their own zone. To boot, he adds an edge that pretty well every other Oiler is missing. Plus/minus can be a deceiving stat, but any time one young defenseman has a plus/minus so much better than some of his teammates (Smid is a +12, compared to -2 and -7 for Tom Gilbert and Denis Grebeshkhov) it warrants attention.
Nathan Panciroli of Edmonton, AB writes:
How much do you miss Ales Hemsky?
So... very... much. But not for the obvious reason (he makes the team better, or at least competitive), but rather the chance of him doing something fantastic would spice up some otherwise depressing Oilers games. The only person who misses him more is Shawn Horcoff, who has amassed the following stats since Hemsky's injury:
7 GP, 1 G, 0 A, 1 PT, -6
And don't forget - the goal he scored went in off his chest. I'd tell Horcoff supporters to put this in their pipe and smoke it... but I don't think there are any Horcoff supporters anymore... and most people don't own a pipe.
Richard Tougas, of Edmonton, AB writes:
Did you see the crowds in Florida and Tampa Bay this week? There weren't more than 1000 people to celebrate Radek Dvorak's 1000th NHL game.
The attendance in both buildings was shocking. It's no secret that hockey in Florida isn't a big draw, but the Panthers had around 2500 fans, and Tampa Bay had no more than 3,000-4,000 (comically announced as 13,744).
Watching hockey games is a lot like watching the old indoor-soccer Edmonton Drillers (back when they played at Rexall Place, not this haphazard reincarnation they've created now). The Drillers games were always filled with kids, attended by 3,000-5,000 people, and there were no die-hard fans. The Oilers games this week were eerily like that.
I can't help but to think it must be weird for young players, who go from playing in front of crowds twice the size in junior, only to graduate to the cavernous Southern arenas of the NHL.


